For the Russian case we whatsapp phone number list must also take into account another issue: the debates between liberal and conservative politicians. This is something else, because the liberal politicians here not only believe in market whatsapp phone number list freedom but also in liberal democracy, and from that position they criticize the regime. On the one hand, for the conservatives, the most important thing is values ​​and they see the whatsapp phone number list liberals as their opponents, since they are people who believe in the individual.
who believe in universal whatsapp phone number list values ​​and who believe that Russian backwardness must be resolved through some form of integration with the West. In this way, of course, the conservative camp defines itself as whatsapp phone number list antagonistic to liberalism. But on the other hand, for conservative critics, some points that are held by the democratic left also appear as liberal values. For example, positions in favor of feminism, the defense of refugee rights or a strong position on climate change, are immediately whatsapp phone number list classified as liberal. And that is a problem for the democratic left, since it tries to distance itself from any position.
A in favor of the market, and whatsapp phone number list in that sense it opposes the liberal camp. But in cultural matters the roles can be mixed. In this framework that you describe, how do we understand the case of the journalist Iván Golunov, arrested in June 2019 by the police with false evidence, when he was going to publish a report that whatsapp phone number list compromised the security services? What makes it different from other cases of political pressure? I think this is related to the previous question. The Golunov case was not only linked to what we could consider a case of political pressure on a person, but rather to pressure on the whatsapp phone number list press in general and on the press